<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments for Stéphane-Robert Langer</title>
	<atom:link href="http://blog.srlanger.com/comments/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://blog.srlanger.com</link>
	<description>Just another Knowledge Worker</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 09:01:52 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>Comment on Cubes and Universes by Stéphane-Robert Langer</title>
		<link>http://blog.srlanger.com/2006/05/24/cubes-and-universes/#comment-2890</link>
		<dc:creator>Stéphane-Robert Langer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 29 Dec 2009 09:01:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://srlanger.wordpress.com/2006/05/24/cubes-and-universes/#comment-2890</guid>
		<description>Michael: Thank you for your kind words. Of course there&#039;s a lot more to SAP&#039;s BI tools than the somewhat disappointing implementation of Business Objects cubes. I&#039;m also not sure if/how that is being merged into SAP Business Warehouse. A strong case could certainly be made for both platforms depending on the situation.

I hope you can sort things out soon. As I think you suggest, it might (to some extent) be more important at some point to choose a direction, stick to it and deliver rather than to select one tool over another.

Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Michael: Thank you for your kind words. Of course there&#8217;s a lot more to SAP&#8217;s BI tools than the somewhat disappointing implementation of Business Objects cubes. I&#8217;m also not sure if/how that is being merged into SAP Business Warehouse. A strong case could certainly be made for both platforms depending on the situation.</p>
<p>I hope you can sort things out soon. As I think you suggest, it might (to some extent) be more important at some point to choose a direction, stick to it and deliver rather than to select one tool over another.</p>
<p>Merry Christmas and a Happy New Year!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cubes and Universes by Michael Schmalz</title>
		<link>http://blog.srlanger.com/2006/05/24/cubes-and-universes/#comment-2889</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Schmalz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Dec 2009 21:46:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://srlanger.wordpress.com/2006/05/24/cubes-and-universes/#comment-2889</guid>
		<description>Nice read...as the Supervisor of Mfg. Development at a Disk Drive Technology company, this debate is near and not-so-dear to my heart. We have been debating the vritues of Microsoft vs. SAP&#039;s BI tools for way too long.....and Donovan (above) nailed it with the comment &quot;...if I were to choose a platform from the developer perspective, SSAS definitely wins hand-down. However, when IT Ops weighs in, BO probably wins 9 out of 10 times.&quot;
I hope someone can someday cut thru all of the non-technical politics and make a decision on which direction our company should go....
Thks again for your insight....mjs</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nice read&#8230;as the Supervisor of Mfg. Development at a Disk Drive Technology company, this debate is near and not-so-dear to my heart. We have been debating the vritues of Microsoft vs. SAP&#8217;s BI tools for way too long&#8230;..and Donovan (above) nailed it with the comment &#8220;&#8230;if I were to choose a platform from the developer perspective, SSAS definitely wins hand-down. However, when IT Ops weighs in, BO probably wins 9 out of 10 times.&#8221;<br />
I hope someone can someday cut thru all of the non-technical politics and make a decision on which direction our company should go&#8230;.<br />
Thks again for your insight&#8230;.mjs</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cubes and Universes by Stéphane-Robert Langer</title>
		<link>http://blog.srlanger.com/2006/05/24/cubes-and-universes/#comment-2888</link>
		<dc:creator>Stéphane-Robert Langer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 20:35:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://srlanger.wordpress.com/2006/05/24/cubes-and-universes/#comment-2888</guid>
		<description>Thank you Santhosh for taking the time to update this page with your findings.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you Santhosh for taking the time to update this page with your findings.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cubes and Universes by Santhosh Shetty</title>
		<link>http://blog.srlanger.com/2006/05/24/cubes-and-universes/#comment-2887</link>
		<dc:creator>Santhosh Shetty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Dec 2009 16:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://srlanger.wordpress.com/2006/05/24/cubes-and-universes/#comment-2887</guid>
		<description>I see this blog is initiaed in 2007. There are few new features added to the latest release (3.1 sp2 ). Universe now has MDX editor and parsing.
Some of the fixes are added for SAP BW which have fixed some SSAS integration issues as well. But, there are differences between MDX generted by Excel and universe(from WEBI).
Never understood why universe creates sets for every measures in the universe when report is just using one of the measures.
Eventhough it is helping subsequent MDX queries where it is getting the data from session cache, but initial set creation causing performance issues.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I see this blog is initiaed in 2007. There are few new features added to the latest release (3.1 sp2 ). Universe now has MDX editor and parsing.<br />
Some of the fixes are added for SAP BW which have fixed some SSAS integration issues as well. But, there are differences between MDX generted by Excel and universe(from WEBI).<br />
Never understood why universe creates sets for every measures in the universe when report is just using one of the measures.<br />
Eventhough it is helping subsequent MDX queries where it is getting the data from session cache, but initial set creation causing performance issues.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cubes and Universes by Stéphane-Robert Langer</title>
		<link>http://blog.srlanger.com/2006/05/24/cubes-and-universes/#comment-2886</link>
		<dc:creator>Stéphane-Robert Langer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 06:58:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://srlanger.wordpress.com/2006/05/24/cubes-and-universes/#comment-2886</guid>
		<description>James,

Thank you for your feedback. I stand corrected - your suggestions for attribute sorting make perfect sense. There also seems to be &lt;a href=&quot;http://blogs.hexaware.com/business-intelligence/business-objects-way/business-objects-security.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;several options for fine-grained security&lt;/a&gt; which I really should have researched initially.

The object-to-object filtering you&#039;re describing seems like a useful option. There are Excel plugins on the market that would allow SSAS end users to apply any kind of complex filter but not without some exposure to MDX - which I agree isn&#039;t as easy as drag-and-drop.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>James,</p>
<p>Thank you for your feedback. I stand corrected &#8211; your suggestions for attribute sorting make perfect sense. There also seems to be <a href="http://blogs.hexaware.com/business-intelligence/business-objects-way/business-objects-security.html" rel="nofollow">several options for fine-grained security</a> which I really should have researched initially.</p>
<p>The object-to-object filtering you&#8217;re describing seems like a useful option. There are Excel plugins on the market that would allow SSAS end users to apply any kind of complex filter but not without some exposure to MDX &#8211; which I agree isn&#8217;t as easy as drag-and-drop.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Cubes and Universes by James Foreman</title>
		<link>http://blog.srlanger.com/2006/05/24/cubes-and-universes/#comment-2884</link>
		<dc:creator>James Foreman</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 14 Sep 2009 02:37:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://srlanger.wordpress.com/2006/05/24/cubes-and-universes/#comment-2884</guid>
		<description>Stephane,

Nice article, but a few points that nobody has seen to correct:

Attribute sorting - the date issue is a bit of a non-starter - that&#039;s to do with particular universe design, rather than a flaw in BO itself.  If you store your months as string data, you&#039;ll only get an alphabetical sort.  If you store your months as datetime data, and apply formatting in the report to make it read April, May, etc then it will sort in chronological fashion.  Now when it comes to arbitrary sorting of other column values, I feel you have a point, but that&#039;s something that has to be worked around in the DB layer, regardless of whether you&#039;d be using cubes or universes - in which case you could generate another column for ordering and use that in BO too.

Your security point is not correct; since (at least) 2000 BO has had the ability to enforce security down to row level in tables; it&#039;s not the case that one has to give all users complete access to the database.  From what I remember (it&#039;s been a good 7 years now since I last did admin work on a BO install) this should integrate with Windows authentication &amp; groups, if you want it to.

Named sets are nice, and that is a failing of BO.  On the other hand, a constant frustration for me in using SSAS via Excel is that I don&#039;t get BO&#039;s nice canned filters (eg dynamically generating last year) which gets you to a similar position.  What&#039;s more convenient (and maybe MS get round it elsewhere in the stack, but if you&#039;ve seen it then it would be nice to be enlightened) is the object-to-object filtering in BO.  If I&#039;m working for an airline and I want to get all the flights we sold where the destination country is the same as the departure country, in BO that&#039;s easy: you have object Destination Country = object Departure Country.  In Excel I seem to be stuck with building a big pivot and taking the leading diagonal.  I suppose if the predefined set existed, I could use that, but if it didn&#039;t then being able to define these relations on the fly in BO seems more beneficial to analysts who aren&#039;t deep in the IT department.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Stephane,</p>
<p>Nice article, but a few points that nobody has seen to correct:</p>
<p>Attribute sorting &#8211; the date issue is a bit of a non-starter &#8211; that&#8217;s to do with particular universe design, rather than a flaw in BO itself.  If you store your months as string data, you&#8217;ll only get an alphabetical sort.  If you store your months as datetime data, and apply formatting in the report to make it read April, May, etc then it will sort in chronological fashion.  Now when it comes to arbitrary sorting of other column values, I feel you have a point, but that&#8217;s something that has to be worked around in the DB layer, regardless of whether you&#8217;d be using cubes or universes &#8211; in which case you could generate another column for ordering and use that in BO too.</p>
<p>Your security point is not correct; since (at least) 2000 BO has had the ability to enforce security down to row level in tables; it&#8217;s not the case that one has to give all users complete access to the database.  From what I remember (it&#8217;s been a good 7 years now since I last did admin work on a BO install) this should integrate with Windows authentication &amp; groups, if you want it to.</p>
<p>Named sets are nice, and that is a failing of BO.  On the other hand, a constant frustration for me in using SSAS via Excel is that I don&#8217;t get BO&#8217;s nice canned filters (eg dynamically generating last year) which gets you to a similar position.  What&#8217;s more convenient (and maybe MS get round it elsewhere in the stack, but if you&#8217;ve seen it then it would be nice to be enlightened) is the object-to-object filtering in BO.  If I&#8217;m working for an airline and I want to get all the flights we sold where the destination country is the same as the departure country, in BO that&#8217;s easy: you have object Destination Country = object Departure Country.  In Excel I seem to be stuck with building a big pivot and taking the leading diagonal.  I suppose if the predefined set existed, I could use that, but if it didn&#8217;t then being able to define these relations on the fly in BO seems more beneficial to analysts who aren&#8217;t deep in the IT department.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on 7 habits of effective desktop data management by Applying a complex Excel model to multiple input values &#171; Stéphane-Robert Langer</title>
		<link>http://blog.srlanger.com/2006/11/13/7-habits-of-effective-desktop-data-management/#comment-2882</link>
		<dc:creator>Applying a complex Excel model to multiple input values &#171; Stéphane-Robert Langer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 28 Aug 2009 07:53:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://srlanger.wordpress.com/2006/11/13/7-habits-of-effective-desktop-data-management/#comment-2882</guid>
		<description>[...] argued before that most (structured) data benefits from being stored in a a flat file format. One of the [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] argued before that most (structured) data benefits from being stored in a a flat file format. One of the [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft Office PerformancePoint Server 2007 CTP available now by Stéphane-Robert Langer</title>
		<link>http://blog.srlanger.com/2006/11/22/microsoft-office-performancepoint-server-2007-ctp-available-now/#comment-2880</link>
		<dc:creator>Stéphane-Robert Langer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 17 Jun 2009 05:42:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://srlanger.wordpress.com/2006/11/22/microsoft-office-performancepoint-server-2007-ctp-available-now/#comment-2880</guid>
		<description>Puneet: As indicated above, I am not doing much with PerformancePoint anymore. I&#039;m afraid I am not in the best of positions to help you out. Did you check the &lt;a href=&quot;http://social.technet.microsoft.com/forums/en-US/category/performancepointserver/&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;Microsoft techNet forums&lt;/a&gt;?

Take care.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Puneet: As indicated above, I am not doing much with PerformancePoint anymore. I&#8217;m afraid I am not in the best of positions to help you out. Did you check the <a href="http://social.technet.microsoft.com/forums/en-US/category/performancepointserver/" rel="nofollow">Microsoft techNet forums</a>?</p>
<p>Take care.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on Microsoft Office PerformancePoint Server 2007 CTP available now by Puneet Sud</title>
		<link>http://blog.srlanger.com/2006/11/22/microsoft-office-performancepoint-server-2007-ctp-available-now/#comment-2879</link>
		<dc:creator>Puneet Sud</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 16 Jun 2009 10:34:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://srlanger.wordpress.com/2006/11/22/microsoft-office-performancepoint-server-2007-ctp-available-now/#comment-2879</guid>
		<description>HELLO

I need your help on performance point server. I have installed pps on standalone on my server with sql server OAK-IPLAB-SP but when i try to add the users in pps it gives message &#039; no records found&#039;.

When I take oak-iplab-sp\officeserver it gives me the message on the configuration i.e &#039; Sql sever instance sp2 should be running&#039; though it has been installed already while checking it on add and remove command.

My users are in active directory.

Kindly help me soon

Regards

Puneet Sud</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>HELLO</p>
<p>I need your help on performance point server. I have installed pps on standalone on my server with sql server OAK-IPLAB-SP but when i try to add the users in pps it gives message &#8216; no records found&#8217;.</p>
<p>When I take oak-iplab-sp\officeserver it gives me the message on the configuration i.e &#8216; Sql sever instance sp2 should be running&#8217; though it has been installed already while checking it on add and remove command.</p>
<p>My users are in active directory.</p>
<p>Kindly help me soon</p>
<p>Regards</p>
<p>Puneet Sud</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment on KPI library by Luis Stabile</title>
		<link>http://blog.srlanger.com/2008/04/25/kpi-library/#comment-2878</link>
		<dc:creator>Luis Stabile</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 16:55:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://blog.srlanger.com/2008/04/25/kpi-library/#comment-2878</guid>
		<description>Very nice idea to have a KPI library</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Very nice idea to have a KPI library</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
